The Episcopal Church opens up to gay and lesbian members with full fellowship and elects a gay bishop. Several congregations split off and join the Nigerians and the Anglican church issues a stern pronouncement and demand to the Episcopals to "state explicitly by September 30th that it will bar the blessing of same-sex unions and stop consecrating openly gay bishops." The Episcopalian response?
The rebuff the demand. As Andrew Sullivan calls it, it's an astonishing act of conscience.
Here is part of the response:
"We proclaim the Gospel of what God has done and is doing in Christ, of the dignity of every human being, and of justice, compassion, and peace. We proclaim the Gospel that in Christ there is no Jew or Greek, no male or female, no slave or free. We proclaim the Gospel that in Christ all God's children, including women, are full and equal participants in the life of Christ's Church. We proclaim the Gospel that in Christ all God's children, including gay and lesbian persons, are full and equal participants in the life of Christ's Church. We proclaim the Gospel that stands against any violence, including violence done to women and children as well as those who are persecuted because of their differences, often in the name of God. The (Primates') Communiqué is distressingly silent on this subject. And, contrary to the way (others) have represented us, we proclaim a Gospel that welcomes diversity of thought and encourages free and open theological debate as a way of seeking God's truth. If that means that others reject us and communion with us, as some have already done, we must with great regret and sorrow accept their decision."
Sadly though, it looks like we are one step away from schism.
But does it have to be only grey clouds? I see a silver lining perhaps. It's a long step from this to what I'm going to suggest, but that won't stop me :).
There seems to be a realignment in Christianity. Perhaps not as big a relignment that occured in America at the time of the Civil War, and definitely not as big as the reformation, but a realignment nonetheless.
And if I were to grossly simplify the split, it would be between the love and the law. Churches and congregations that emphasize the teaching of love and others that emphasize practice and doctrine. Of course it's not nearly that simple, but generally true in a broad brush sort of way. The former would be UCC and the Episcopalian church and the latter would be the Assemblies of God and the Catholics. Of course within each of these churches are individuals and congregations that fit the other side of that divide, but the divide is becoming more and more stark as churches, congregations and individuals take stands...
and denominations split. Many denominations are being affected.
The 'gay' issue is more a symptom than the cause. As is women in clergy and many other issues.
Perhaps, and I doubt this will happen but I would like to see it...
As churches such as the Swedish church, the UCC and the Episcopals start to shift to the 'teaching of love' side, they should formally realign and create a more unified and official communion of congregations that empasize the Jesus' teaching of love.
Call it the United Communion in Christ :).
Comments (2)
My church (United Methodist) may be heading for a split as well. Our local congregation is a "reconciling ministry" in all but name and we're talking about formalizing it. Our Bishops seem to be unanimous on love and acceptance (is that the wrong word to use?).
A few of the old guard at the very top, however, have made some horrid decisions and the attitude within the congregations varies widely from congregation to congregation.
P. S. I can't see a space to post your name. I'll try to post this and see what happens.
Comment #11593 on March 29, 2007 8:06 AM |
acceptance sounds like the right word to me!
the space is right under the space you right the comment in, or it should be.
you were able to post without doing it? hmm... back to the drawing bard.
Comment #11598 on March 29, 2007 9:41 AM |